Talk:Lyme disease

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lyme disease article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7: 2 months

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Lyme disease was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 1, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
February 27, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
March 20, 2007	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
June 20, 2008	Good article reassessment	Delisted
March 19, 2013	Peer review	Reviewed
Current status: Delisted good article

Medicine: Dermatology / Translation / Neurology High‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Translation task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Lyme disease.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article, in a manner that does not comply with Wikipedia's policies. Editors are encouraged to use neutral mechanisms for requesting outside input (e.g. a "request for comment", a third opinion or other noticeboard post, or neutral criteria: "pinging all editors who have edited this page in the last 48 hours"). If someone has asked you to provide your opinion here, examine the arguments, not the editors who have made them. Reminder: disputes are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote.

This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Lyme disease. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Lyme disease at the Reference desk.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

June 28 to July 4, 2015 (16th)

Lab Escape Conspiracy Theory

Is it worth mentioning the debunked idea that Lyme Disease is a "lab escape" from Plum Island? https://aldf.com/did-lyme-disease-originate-in-the-eastern-u-s-from-borrelia-burgdorferi-infected-ticks-that-escaped-from-a-laboratory-at-the-plum-island-animal-disease-center-where-scientists-were-conducting-top-sec/ Michael Hurwicz (talk) 22:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I think that since out new secretary of health asserts this inanity is true we must seriously rebut it. Litch (talk) 00:21, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How is there no mention on this page of the book published in 2019 (Bitten) or the legislation passed that same year in Congress which was widely reporter in the news??? This seems insane not to include. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jul/16/pentagon-review-weaponised-ticks-lyme-disease 2400:2410:9722:FC00:BF58:320C:85AE:53F9 (talk) 19:33, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congresscritters call for "review" of things all the time, that's not notable. As for the book, you'd need reliable secondary sources discussing the book to include it here. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 22:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@2400:2410:9722:FC00:BF58:320C:85AE:53F9 Please refrain from inserting AI slop into wikipedia articles. Some of those references in your edits were simply made up. ScienceFlyer (talk) 15:09, 24 February 2025 (UTC) ScienceFlyer (talk) 15:09, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: One Health Connections

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2025 and 30 April 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BellaCamilleWright (article contribs). Peer reviewers: BellaCamilleWright.

— Assignment last updated by BellaCamilleWright (talk) 19:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chronic Lyme fudge

Asto77 Why are you adding links to the "Johns Hopkins Medicine Lyme Disease Research Center"? This is not a MEDRS and contains some dubious/quackery adjacent content. There are vast numbers of suitable MEDRS sources on lyme disease so no need for dubious sources. To be clear Chronic lyme disease is pseudo-medicine and Wikipedia needs to be ultra-careful about not blending it with legitimate lyme medicine (in the way, of course, that proponents strive for with their confusions of terms). Bon courage (talk) 14:04, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged one of the edits with the {{citation needed}} template for what it's worth. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 14:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

apologies will remove. i thought John Hopkins regarded as acceptable source. thanks Asto77 (talk) 14:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling variety on article

Which spelling variety (i.e. American English, British English, etc.) should we consider using for this article as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Spelling? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 14:09, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be US "English" (discolored e.g.). Bon courage (talk) 14:18, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've tagged the article with the American English template where appropriate. While I'm at it, should we keep the dmy format or switch to the mdy format? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 14:28, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly not long until a separate article for Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS) is appropriate

see e.g. Long Covid. Asto77 (talk) 14:24, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Currently redirects to[1]. If that sections gets big, then a WP:SPLIT could be on the table. But it's quite short at the moment. Bon courage (talk) 14:34, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Transmission time

@Asto77 I'm confused as to why you reverted my edit to remove a redundant section. The article already says: Risk of infection increases with time of attachment, but in North America risk of Lyme disease is small if the tick is removed within 36 hours.

I support re-including the substance of this well-sourced statement that was in the article prior to today's edits:

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "In most cases, a tick must be attached for 36 to 48 hours or more before the Lyme disease bacterium can be transmitted. If you remove a tick quickly (within 24 hours), you can greatly reduce your chances of getting Lyme disease." In Europe, Ixodes ricinus ticks may spread the bacteria more quickly.

There is no reliable evidence or citation in support of the statement in the present revision:

However a 2014 review found that there was no evidence of a minimum attachment time for transmission, that ticks may have spirochetes in their salivary glands prior to feeding, and that there was anecdotal evidence that infection could occur in humans within a short time after tick attachment.

Therefore, it should be removed immediately. If you're looking for a reliable source on attachment time, I'd suggest this CDC review. ScienceFlyer (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm out of capacity so I'll revet Asto77 (talk) 20:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]